نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
This article aims to examine the deep connection between jurisprudence (fiqh) and politics in the Islamic system by analyzing various categories that are considered undesirable or forbidden (haram) in jurisprudential texts. It highlights how certain economic behaviors—falling under these categories—can pose a threat to religious security and governance.
The study adopts a descriptive-analytical approach and draws upon jurisprudential sources and Islamic principles to explore the issue. In this context, several designations such as faqir (poor), qasir (incompetent), mo‘ser (indebted), maghbun (deceived), and mofles (miserable) are examined as undesirable labels in jurisprudential literature. Similarly, thief, fraudster, usurper, briber, hoarder, usurer, gambler, betrayer of trust, broker, beggar, cheater in trade, neglector of khums, cheater in weights and measures, and wasteful spender are explored as forbidden titles. The findings indicate that these individuals, through their improper economic conduct, not only contribute to economic instability and public distrust but may also trigger social dissatisfaction and even political instability. The study concludes that strict enforcement of jurisprudential rulings, strengthening economic oversight, promoting awareness of economic justice, and providing employment and support for vulnerable groups are among the effective solutions to counter these threats. Additionally, financial and economic transparency, strict action against violators, and strengthening regulatory institutions can help mitigate such dangers. Ultimately, the article emphasizes that the integration of jurisprudence and politics in an Islamic system is not only a theoretical necessity but also a practical requirement for maintaining security and stability in an Islamic society.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)