نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته حوزه علمیه قم و دکترای تخصصی علوم سیاسی از دانشگاه باقرالعلوم. قم. ایران
2 مدرس، فقه و مبانی حقوق، حوزه علمیه قم، قم. ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The principle of dignity (ʿizzah) and the Principle of the Negation of Domination (Qāʿidat Nafy al-Sabīl), derived respectively from the Qur'anic verses, "To Allah belong all honor, and to His Messenger and the believers" (Qur'an 63:8) and "Allah will never grant the disbelievers a way over the believers" (Qur'an 4:141), have consistently occupied a foundational position within the political and jurisprudential thought of Islam. Together, they constitute a normative framework for political conduct and deterrent action while providing a theoretical basis for analyzing the behavior of Islamic states in international relations. This study addresses the following research question: Can the relationship between the principle of dignity and the Principle of the Negation of Domination be regarded as a contemporary deterrent framework for Islamic states in international relations? It argues that the integration of these two principles significantly influences indigenous models of power-building and strategic defense in the foreign policies of Islamic states. Adopting a descriptive-analytical approach and drawing upon Qur'anic exegesis, Islamic jurisprudence, and theories of international relations, the study demonstrates that the principle of dignity requires the rejection of all forms of domination, humiliation, and passivity in the international sphere. Likewise, the Principle of the Negation of Domination establishes a normative boundary that prevents the emergence of any legal, political, economic, or security superiority of non-Muslim powers over Muslim communities. The findings indicate that the combination of these two principles provides an indigenous framework for understanding deterrence in international relations. Within this framework, deterrence is grounded not only in military capability but also in identity-based resistance, strategic autonomy, political legitimacy, and the preservation of collective dignity. Accordingly, the principle of dignity defines the positive normative horizon, whereas the Principle of the Negation of Domination establishes the protective negative boundary. Together, they offer a foundational theoretical framework for safeguarding the independence of Muslim states against the hegemonic practices of international actors.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)