نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشیار، عضو هیات علمی گروه مسائل فقهی و حقوقی پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی، قم.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The expansion of terrorism through the actions of the Zionist regime has placed numerous innocent individuals under threat. The absence of a clear and universally accepted definition of terrorism, coupled with the political motivations of certain states that support specific forms of terrorism—and at times engage in acts of terror themselves under pretexts such as the “fight against terrorism”—has compounded the challenges of combating terrorism. Political approaches to terrorism have resulted in Iran’s accession to international conventions being subject to reservations, and at times encountering obstacles. Domestically, Iranian laws governing the fight against terrorism are often unable to address current needs due to evolving manifestations of terrorism, and there is a growing necessity to expand the territorial jurisdiction of national courts to address certain forms of terror. Moreover, efforts to equate emerging manifestations of terrorism with certain criminal categories in Islamic jurisprudence—such as moharebeh (armed hostility against society), efsad fi al-ard (spreading corruption on earth), fatk (premeditated treachery), baghi (armed rebellion), and ightiyal (assassination)—without adequate consideration for international interpretations, have sometimes failed to resolve issues effectively. Therefore, revising existing laws, expanding territorial jurisdiction, and recognizing novel forms of terrorism are imperative for an effective counter-terrorism framework within Iranian law.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)