نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
سطح چهار حوزه علمیه، دکترای فقه از جامعة المصطفی، قم، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
In the contemporary world, the tension between tradition and modernity has become a significant challenge for political and cultural systems. The system of Wilayat Faqih, as a model of governance, faces fundamental questions regarding its ability to engage with modernism and its achievements. This article focuses on the central question of whether modernism—as a rationality-based, technology-driven movement—can coexist with an Islamic government grounded in Wilayat Faqih, examining the dimensions of this encounter. Modernism, scientific progress, and individualism promote a worldview that appears to conflict with the foundations of religious governance. On the other hand, an Islamic government, based on divine injunctions, cannot remain indifferent to global developments. Using a descriptive-analytical approach and drawing on primary Islamic sources and historical philosophical texts, this study investigates four key pillars: (1) modernism and its dimensions, (2) the structure of Islamic governance, (3) the flexibility of Sharia rulings, and (4) mechanisms for jurisprudential interaction with technology.The findings indicate that in the fields of empirical sciences and technology, interaction is not only possible but necessary; however, in the ideological domain, serious confrontation persists. The article presents a jurisprudential framework for leveraging modern achievements in service of Sharia objectives, relying on concepts such as “governing rulings” and “the influence of time and place in ijtihad.” At the same time, it warns that any engagement must not alter the foundations of Sharia or weaken religious authority. This research charts a novel path for overcoming the deadlock between tradition and modernity in religious governance.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)